On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Thierry Moreau wrote: > I agree with your other post that such (IPR related!!??) discussions may > prevent dnsop from addressing the on-topic issue, i.e. a consensus-based > DNSSEC root priming specification.
It is not the "IPR discussion" that is preventing this. It's the IPR. The discussion is on addressing the IPR problem. It is clear that your interest is to not have an IPR discussion and to continue like there is no issue so you can cash your IPR claims. Your claim that this discussion should not be helt because it prevents talking about the real issue is not addressing the problem created by your IPR claims - dropping your IPR claims however, would resolve this issue - at least temporarilly until the IETF can find a structural solution to the problem of IPR poisoning in general. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
