On Oct 20, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > It might that IETF should consider "bare names" out of its scope, except > perhaps to say that they're not DNS names, they don't have to necessarily be > mappable to DNS names, and that their use and behavior is host and > application-dependent.
Can we please not redefine what a "DNS name" is to meet a particular agenda? Isn't it sufficient to say a 'bare name' does not conform to a hostname as defined in RFC 952 and modified by RFCs 1122? Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
