[Copy to dnsop since the qname minimisation draft is now a WG item at dnsop.]
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:21:57AM -0700, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote a message of 56 lines which said: > http://www.google.com/patents/EP2611116A1?cl=en Well, some resolvers (the programs which will have to implement qname m12n) are maintained in Europe (for instance Unbound) so they can safely ignore these patents <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_patents_under_the_European_Patent_Convention> Back to IETF issues: can someone who have read RFC 3979 more thoroughly than me tell me if, as the draft author, I'm supposed to file the IPR disclosure or is it up to Verisign employees? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
