> On Oct 25, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ph...@hallambaker.com> > wrote: > > The claims are broad, not specific to one field of use. > > But there isn't a patent yet and they may have been waiting to file after > grant. > > It is possible for someone other than the IPR holder to file but best if its > the IPR holder. > > The mere existence of a patent does not necessarily mean an intention to > enforce. >
Verisign has been telling its investors that they have intention to enforce and monetize patents. Excerpts from their SEC filings and investor calls can be found at: http://domainnamewire.com/2013/01/25/heads-up-competing-registries-verisign-might-start-asserting-its-patents/ <http://domainnamewire.com/2013/01/25/heads-up-competing-registries-verisign-might-start-asserting-its-patents/> http://domainnamewire.com/2014/09/24/verisigns-standards-group-patents/ <http://domainnamewire.com/2014/09/24/verisigns-standards-group-patents/> Rubens
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
