> Warren Kumari <mailto:war...@kumari.net> > Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:10 PM > > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org > <mailto:p...@redbarn.org>> wrote: > > > >> Paul Hoffman <mailto:paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> >> Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:06 AM >> >> 1) It is a patent application, not a patent. >> 2) The application was filed by Verisign, not Google. >> >> --Paul Hoffman > > thanks. however, i was told google also has one on Q-M. that's the > one i thought this thread referred to. > > > > Just an explicit "I personally do not know of any qname minimization > patent(s) that Google has". > > I had heard some rumors of a Google patent regarding prepending nonces > to add entropy, but that's completely different. now that i read both (http://www.google.com/patents/US8484377) i see that warren is correct.
i'll stand by my other statement-- verisign should be asked to put their Q-M work (http://www.google.com/patents/EP2611116A1) into defensive-only use. -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
