> i realize that "no" votes aren't counted. but that's going to be my input if > any document along the lines of adding persistence to tcp/53 is adopted by > the WG. so, for full disclosure, i wanted to weigh in at this stage.
TCP/53 is already persistent, it just happens most clients don't take advantage of that feature. The point of my draft is to permit signalling that the current connection should _not_ be persisted ;-) kind regards, Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
