I agree with Paul Hoffman. While I think draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive is good, even the simpler draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close would be much better than the current situation, so I support its adoption.
DW On Jan 20, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:37 AM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive is a reasonable document, but > draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close achieves a great deal at a very low cost. > If we drop draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive (which seems likely if the > authors don't want to pursue it), we should adopt > draft-bellis-dnsop-connection-close and answer the many questions in the > draft. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
