Sorry for the empty previous post.

My recollection is somewhat different from the AC "requesting" the
revocation.  But then the then AC reads this list and can relate
himself if he wishes to do so.

And I was quite upset at the time because I wanted dibs on IMODI.UM
(just for the fun of it, not for squatting, actually with the
express proviso until and/or if Janssen or whoever holds the trade
mark now, wanted it :-)-O)

el

On 2015-07-07 11:27, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> 
> As I'm sure our resident bad-idea-fairy can relate in greater
> detail, .UM was a delegated ccTLD with SLD subdelegations and at
> least one user, before the administrative contact requested that
> the TLD delegation be rescinded or deactivated or whatever you
> want to call it.
> 
> Just a little more colorful history of the shub-Internet.
>     
>                 -Bill
> 
[...]

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
e...@lisse.na            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to