Hum…  The then director has no recollection of that and a request to ICANN to 
produce such a letter was denied.  All we have is an assertion that a request 
was made.
Neither Herb, nor Bob have any idea what happened.  In the interests of 
openness & transparency, one might expect less demure behaviors.  I would go 
into more detail,
but it is not WG related.  

….
back in Dec 2014, this exchange occurred:
————
> 
> I have been doing some research and can find no one here at ISI who remembers 
> this communication and there is no written record of this exchange.   Would 
> it be possible to get a copy from you?
> It does not appear to be available from the normal ICANN archives.

Thanks for your enquiry.

It is standard IANA practice that the details of the communications we have 
with directly involved parties are held in confidence. For requests relating to 
substantial changes of control for ccTLDs (e.g. delegations, transfers and 
retirement) a report is published after the conclusion of such requests that is 
a distillation of the relevant facts, but the underlying communications with 
the parties are not.

With kindest regards,

Kim Davies
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
ICANN
———————


manning
bmann...@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102



On 8July2015Wednesday, at 17:36, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:

> No.
> 
> At the time, the Administrative Contact as listed in the IANA Whois database 
> was USC-ISI. They (IIRC, the Director of ISI) requested the TLD to be removed 
> from the root zone.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2015, at 12:57 AM, Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 7, 2015, at 6:43 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse <e...@lisse.na> wrote:
>>> My recollection is somewhat different from the AC "requesting" the
>>> revocation.
>> 
>> I meant the Department of the Interior.  If I’m remembering correctly.
>> 
>>                               -Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to