> On 16 Mar 2016, at 01:22, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > > Well, the point is that the class can't do the job it was supposed to > (select one of many parallel delegation sets) because the names are > prior to the classes. I didn't intend to blame anything, but to > suggest that if names were supposed to be subsidiary to classes then > being able to tell which class you were in before selecting the name > would be handy.
By that argument, DNS names should be reversed to big-endian order. (I think the argument that the syntactic position of the class somehow affects its meaning is silly.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
