it wasn't my intention to ignore the socio-legal issue, but the problem statement also can't presume a solution. I will think about this and try to come up with better text. thanks for the feedback, both of you.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:16 PM, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Alain Durand <alain.dur...@icann.org> > wrote: > > Reading section 4.2 and 4.3 of draft-tldr-sutld-ps-00, it would appear > you > > are in the camp that does believe those “special names” are immune those > > socio-economic pressures and/or the IETF can deal with this. Do I get > this > > right? > > I too believe this is implicit in what ted wrote. > > > If that is the case, then, it is not that one document is better than the > > other, there is a fundamental difference between the perspectives of the > > authors. > > this too I agree with. > > It seems to me that there is a substantive issue which has to be > documented as "problem" > > Is the IETF actually the right SDO to define a label which has to be > added to a zone which the IETF gave substantive control over, to > another (non-SDO) body? > > I think that the socio-legal issues which vest inside ICANN cannot be > ignored simply because of a technical need/merit argument. Especially > when the technology claims a specific label, not just the concept of a > reservation for an otherwise unstated label. > > > > > It should follow that this is a non technical issue that is much larger > than > > DNSop wg. As such, the DNSop wg might want to refrain from adopting one > or > > the other document until the IETF, as a community, under the leadership > of > > the IAB, comes to an agreement on that fundamental question. After all, > the > > interpretation of RFC2860 (ICANN/IETF MoU) is the prerogative of the IAB. > > And it would come as little surprise that this too, I concur with. > > I like Ted's document. I liked it a lot. But without recognition of > this question of "who decides" I think as a document specifying the > problem statement, its incomplete. > > For me, it is simply not a "given" that the IETF is the right place to > determine labels in the top zone. > > cheers > > -George > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
