Jim, but you raise for me another question - if 90% will be served by google,etc - what the real value and role of the roots?
Dima > On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:32 PM, Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote: > > >> On 18 Dec 2016, at 15:11, Ralf Weber <d...@fl1ger.de> wrote: >> >> There are other ways of reducing the crap to the root servers (RFC 7706). I >> don't think NSEC Agressive use will reduce crap a lot as if I remember >> correctly from Geoff Houstons last presentation still around 80% of the >> resolver don't use DNSSEC and thus even can't implement NSEC Aggressive use. > > First, apologies for a meaningful and relevant Subject: header. :-) > > Ralf, it’s not a question of how many resolving servers do and don’t use > DNSSEC. It’s a question of how many clients that are behind them. > > ISTR Geoff saying that quite a large proportion of the Internet relies on > google’s or Comcast’s resolving servers. So if they were to deploy NSEC > Aggressive Use, it should significantly reduce the crap query traffic going > to the root. > > That said, it would be good to get some data on this or model it somehow, say > by using the DITL datasets. Any volunteers? > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
