On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, bert hubert wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:43:25AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 20 Dec 2016, at 8:35, Ray Bellis wrote:
The document primarily covers BIND's behaviour.
Noted. That seems like a good reason for ISC to document it.
No it doesn't. It also documents the exact PowerDNS behaviour. RPZ is a
standard, even if it isn't an RFC yet. It interoperates extensively.
Unbound is also slated to have support for RPZ.
One would hope it interops, as this document only describes an IXFR/AXFR
of a zone with existing RRTYPEs with some semantics associated to CNAME
records for other applications (such as DNS servers)
Did you mean "interoperate" as in how it uses this information for query
firewalling? If so, wouldn't that be out of scope of the current draft
and discussion? (unless: see my other email with concerns about this)
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
