Mark,
> On Feb 1, 2017, at 3:56 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > > In message > <cahw9_i+8pa3fqx8fqw-xq_96it7k-g5urmb7fxarui1gwq+...@mail.gmail.com>, Warren K > umari writes: >> This is a fine thing to request in an IANA consideratons, but isn't >> necessarily *useful* -- the IANA has the technical ability to add >> stuff to the root zone, but not the mandate (this is like walking into >> a bank and requesting the teller gives you a bunch of money - they may >> be able to do so, but aren't actually allowed to.. :-)). > > Actually it isn't the same. > > Implicit in the agreement that the IETF can get names in the root > namespace is the ability to use them. Some uses require that there > be a entry in the root zone. > > It doesn't say that the IETF can "RESERVE" a name. The IETF gets > the name. Can you suggest a citation for this belief that can be included in the problem statement draft? It’s not a view that’s ever been discussed as far as I can recall and it seems to me that it would be difficult to get consensus on it across the affected communities. But I’m always willing to be wrong. thanks, Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
