> From: Jim Reid [mailto:j...@rfc1035.com]
>
> > On 20 Jul 2017, at 02:17, Woodworth, John R
> > <john.woodwo...@centurylink.com> wrote:
> >
> > this is just a next-gen $GENERATE
>
> Indeed. We all get that. However $GENERATE is a BIND-ism, like
> views. It’s not part of the DNS protocol. I’m not yet
> convinced $GENERATE (albeit with a BULK makeover) needs to be.
>
> The use case for BULK still hasn’t been made IMO.
>
Hi Jim,
Thanks again for your comments.
Wow, tough crowd... glad I wasn't in the WG to see all the
"Just use [Del] key!" comments when SPF floated in. ;{>
Thanks,
John
-- THESE ARE THE DROIDS TO WHOM I REFER:
This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confidential
or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the communication and any attachments.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
