On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:55 PM Colm MacCárthaigh <c...@allcosts.net> wrote:
> > Just a question on this: was the old/classic behavior really > random/shuffled? Or was it that bind would "rotate" through iterations > where the order was the same each time if you think of the rrset list as a > ring, but with a different start and end point within that ring? (That's > what's described here: > https://docstore..mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_07.htm > <https://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/dns/ch10_07.htm>) > ISC veterans can confirm, but my recollection is that the earliest implementations were indeed as described above - the response RRset was cycled/rotated, rather than randomized. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
