That was me on the mic.

To clarify:

DNS open source implementers discussed it earlier this week to see if there is still appetite for ANAME. The last draft did not see a lot of comments. To get things moving again we thought it might be a good idea to make a document with reduced scope.

Matthijs


On 3/26/19 4:17 PM, Dan York wrote:



On Mar 26, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Olli Vanhoja <o...@zeit.co <mailto:o...@zeit.co>> wrote:

Did someone say that there will be a side meeting about mvp ANAME
during this week? If so, I couldn't find that from the calendar.

I believe it was a comment from someone at the mic that the *authors* were going to have a side meeting to talk about simplifying the draft and providing a new version.

If it is a larger meeting than just the authors, then there are probably a number of us who would be interested.

Dan

--
Dan York
Director of Web Strategy, Internet Society
y...@isoc.org <mailto:y...@isoc.org>   +1-603-439-0024
Jabber: y...@jabber..isoc.org <mailto:y...@jabber.isoc.org> Skype: danyork http://twitter.com/danyork

http://www.internetsociety.org/

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to