Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> writes: Thanks Stephane,
Thanks for the comments. Responses are inline below in my tracking notes below. 14.3 DONE Stephane Bortzmeyer ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IMHO, the document is good. I like the fact there is no longer a limitation of a given EDE to some RCODEs (it makes things simpler). Some details, all editorial: 14.3.1 DONE it could be a good idea to add more specific references for the --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDE. For instance, 3 "Stale Answer" could have a reference to draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale. + Rseponse that seems popular; I'll try to do this where I can. 14.3.2 DONE I think that many people will be confused with 15, 16, 17 and 18. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suggestions: * remove 18, which is redundant with 15 (if the user chooses the resolver, and he should have the right to do so, 15 and 18 are the same). 18 is meaningful only if the user does have a simple way to change this behaviour. * Add to the definition of 15 "The policy was decided by the server administrators" * Add to the definition of 16 "This means that the policy was not decided by the server administrators, and it is probably useless to complain to them". + Response: Those three codes were supplied in a previous comment round and they are supposed to indicate policies being applied from different sources. Can you check the new text of them to see if they are more understandable now? -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop