On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:49 AM Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Petr Špaček <petr.spa...@nic.cz> wrote: > > > > 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a > > consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft? > > Is it useful as it is? > > I expect almost no-one can do anything with EDE without > getaddrinfo() EAI_ return code extensions. >
I would personally find this to useful if only dig (or drill or delve or...) supported this -- it's currently hard to actually debug weird DNS failures, and simply providing information to a human using diagnostic tools would be helpful. This and the "DNSSEC bogus -> ask another resolver" are to my mind the primary uses... W > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > Plymouth: Variable 4 or less. Smooth or slight, occasionally moderate later in > west. Mainly fair. Good._______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
