Hi,

FWIW: Triggered by the ADs mail on this ML and after re-reading -17 I would
like to make clear that the current draft looks pretty good to me with minor
nits as mentioned in this thread.

Br
Martin

Excerpts from Paul Hoffman's message of 2022-08-23 18:52:18 +0000:
> Thanks again for all the discussion; it is helping the document. You can see 
> from the diff at 
> <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-17> that we have 
> tightened the language, particularly around what is display format and what 
> is wire format. More comments are of course welcome.
> 
> --Paul and Warren

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to