On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 8:07 AM, Martin Schanzenbach < mschanzenb...@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > FWIW: Triggered by the ADs mail on this ML and after re-reading -17 I > would like to make clear that the current draft looks pretty good to me > with minor nits as mentioned in this thread. > Excellent, and thank you very much![0] W [0]: One grows accustomed to the normal IETF interaction of "You mistyped 'the' as 'hte' on page 347 of draft-foo-bar-baz. That was dumb and you should feel dumb" - it's nice to get a supportive email :-) W > Br > Martin > > Excerpts from Paul Hoffman's message of 2022-08-23 18:52:18 +0000: > > Thanks again for all the discussion; it is helping the document. You can > see from the diff at <https://www.ietf.org/ > rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-17> that we have tightened the > language, particularly around what is display format and what is wire > format. More comments are of course welcome. > > --Paul and Warren > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
