On Dec 14, 2022, at 11:29, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: > > > We're off in the woods again. Let's keep these two principles in mind: > > The DNS resolution mechanisms are not expected to resolve, let alone secure > names ending in .ALT. > How other resolution mechanisms secure names is their affair. I don’t think people disagree on this.
>> On 14.12.22 17:13, Paul Wouters wrote: >> "bob.foo.alt" still squarely falls into "my" namespace >> It is indeed not “yours”. > ... from the perspective of DNS. Whether it is "yours" or "mine" from the > perspective of GNS is a matter for GNS to resolve (for example). > I was not talking from the perspective of IETF or DNS. The .alt is the Wild West. Even GNS cannot claim exclusivity of a chunk of it. It is competing with all the other unregulated namespaces. Martin said he cannot help other alternative namespaces using the same alternative namespace as he is using. I merely confirmed that and recommend that if he is looking for exclusivity, he has to leave the Wild West behind and go to a regulated space and play within the rules set out there to get his exclusive namespace. Paul > Eliot > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
