It’s hard to see how the way that qdcount >1 was “standardized” (by word of mouth without any document) was in any sense healthy, unfortunately.
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 08:49, Masataka Ohta < mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > Ted Lemon wrote: > > > Oh, I’m sorry, I thought you were referring to something else. You’re > quite > > correct about inverse queries! > > And IP options and DNS queries matching multiple RR types. > > I really hope you learn something from the so healthy > standardization process to recognize them meaningless. > > Masataka Ohta > >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
