John, On Nov 10, 2023, at 11:55 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > DNSBLs have been around a lot longer than QNAME minimization.
Not sure that’s relevant — I presume you’re not suggesting DNSBLs are a predominant use of the DNS. > They > work(ed) fine without minimization and I don't think it is reasonable > to expect every mail system in the world to change their configuration > to work around our performance bug. I thought the point of QNAME minimization was to improve privacy. Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
