_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
we need Q-M, since without it NXDOMAIN is ambiguous. a full resolver
("recursive nameserver") who looks up wrong2.wrong1 deserves to know
that wrong1 doesn't exist so that it need not ask the root name servers
about wrong3.wrong1. whatever ambiguities may come from Q-M will have a
lower cost than those it addresses and according to engineering
economics would be addressed separately from the original problem and
after the current solution, unless a new solution is available that
addresses both.
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Denny Watson
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Denny Watson
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] QNAME minimization is bad Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Mark Delany
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] QNAME minimization is ... Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] QNAME minimization... David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization: we screwe... John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization, we screwe... John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization, we sc... Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization, ... Rubens Kuhl
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimization is bad Brian Dickson