On Nov 10, 2023, at 21:41, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > > John, > > On Nov 10, 2023, at 11:55 AM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >> DNSBLs have been around a lot longer than QNAME minimization. > > Not sure that’s relevant — I presume you’re not suggesting DNSBLs are a > predominant use of the DNS.
DNSBLs are one of the biggest use cases for the DNS outside of "find me the host". They are one of the primary reasons your inbox is not drowning worse in spam. >> They >> work(ed) fine without minimization and I don't think it is reasonable >> to expect every mail system in the world to change their configuration >> to work around our performance bug. > > I thought the point of QNAME minimization was to improve privacy. It is. Nothing in the John's proposal would reduce that, would it? --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
