It appears that libor.peltan <libor.pel...@nic.cz> said: >Hi all, > >On the other hand, couldn't it actually be beneficial if the signalling >zone name is generic enough, and if (in theory on the future) it is >shared with possibly completely different signals, possibly unrelated to >DNSSEC?
It doesn't seem very likely to me that someone would come up with an unrelated scheme that somehow used the same zone structure. And it's not like there's any shortage of potential name strings. _dnssec or maybe _dnssec-signal tell people what the name is used for. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
