In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> nicforce
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>>>The domain is still listed as being owned by ME,
>>>but is not under MY control ... Until the domain
>>>goes through the redemption period, I'm still
>>>the owner.
>
>No, you're the previous registrant of an expired domain with a
>limited-time option to renew.  Until and unless you exercise that
>option, you have no rights to the domain or its records.  Any
>rights you may have had expired along with the registration.  If
>you want to recover your rights, renew the domain.

Who's name is in the authoritative WHOIS listing in the Owner field?

>>>Sure. And they'll especially like it when those name servers
>>>are cached for an extra 72 hours after they pay and after I
>>>reactivate the site. That's a BIG benefit to me and my
>>>customers.
>
>Simple solution:  Renew the domain name before it expires.  I
>don't really think it takes 72 hours in most cases, but we've
>been telling folks they need to allow up to 72 hours for
>reactivation to take place under the current system, anyway.

It's a good theory.  If you've ever worked customer service for a large
company, you'll know it isn't reality.

Companies, large and small, will forget to renew domains until the
service dies.

>>>Having an immediate answer isn't really all that helpful since
>>>they still need to contact their RSP to renew.
>
>Current situation:
>Customer goes to their web site and gets a DNS error.  Customer
>freaks out and sends me a nasty e-mail telling me what an idiot I
>am for crashing his web site.  Time passes.  I receive the e-mail
>and get all bummed out because my customer is yelling at me.  I
>do the necessary research and discover that the customer has
>allowed his domain registration to expire.  I reply to the
>customer telling him he needs to renew the domain.  Time passes.
>Customer reads my e-mail (assuming he didn't do what about half
>my customers do and log a support ticket using an e-mail address
>from the expired domain).  Customer renews the domain.
>
>Hypothetical New Situation:
>Customer goes to the web site and sees a page explaining that the
>domain registration has expired.  Customer renews the domain.
>
>
>The new situation seems better to me.  Faster, easier, and I'm
>less likely to get yelled at.  However, if it's just a generic
>404 page, it's no better and possibly worse than the old
>situation.
>
>I agree that it would have been nice to have had more notice and
>a better explanation than we received.  I'll withold further
>judgment until we do receive a detailed explanation.

But the key difference is that for up to 72 hours after the customer
renews, their website still tells the world that they're a deadbeat who
didn't pay their bill.  I consider that offensive and insulting, even if
it's correct.

Under the current system, domains will normally be responsive within
15-30 minutes of renewing.  I tell customers "up to 72 hours", but the
under-promise+over-deliver concept of customer service is great when you
tell them 72 hours and the reality is 30 minutes.
_______________________________________________
domains-gen mailing list
[email protected]
http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen

Reply via email to