On 2023-10-11 22:10, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/12/23 03:52, Luben Tuikov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for fixing the title and submitting a v2 of this patch. Comments 
>> inlined below.
>>
>> On 2023-10-09 18:35, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> Currently, job flow control is implemented simply by limiting the number
>>> of jobs in flight. Therefore, a scheduler is initialized with a
>>> submission limit that corresponds to the number of jobs which can be
>>> sent to the hardware.
>>>
>>> This implies that for each job, drivers need to account for the maximum
>>> job size possible in order to not overflow the ring buffer.
>>>
>>> However, there are drivers, such as Nouveau, where the job size has a
>>> rather large range. For such drivers it can easily happen that job
>>> submissions not even filling the ring by 1% can block subsequent
>>> submissions, which, in the worst case, can lead to the ring run dry.
>>>
>>> In order to overcome this issue, allow for tracking the actual job size
>>> instead of the number of jobs. Therefore, add a field to track a job's
>>> submission credits, which represents the number of credits a job
>>> contributes to the scheduler's submission limit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <d...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in V2:
>>> ==============
>>>    - fixed up influence on scheduling fairness due to consideration of a 
>>> job's
>>>      size
>>>      - If we reach a ready entity in drm_sched_select_entity() but can't 
>>> actually
>>>        queue a job from it due to size limitations, just give up and go to 
>>> sleep
>>>        until woken up due to a pending job finishing, rather than continue 
>>> to try
>>>        other entities.
>>>    - added a callback to dynamically update a job's credits (Boris)
>>>    - renamed 'units' to 'credits'
>>>    - fixed commit message and comments as requested by Luben
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c       |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_submit.c  |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c             |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c          |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c       |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c       |   2 +-
>>>   .../gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h   |   2 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c      |   5 +-
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c        | 101 +++++++++++++-----
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c                 |   2 +-
>>>   include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h                   |  33 ++++--
>>>   11 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>> index 78476bc75b4e..d54daaf64bf1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
>>> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int amdgpu_job_alloc(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct 
>>> amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>>     if (!entity)
>>>             return 0;
>>>   
>>> -   return drm_sched_job_init(&(*job)->base, entity, owner);
>>> +   return drm_sched_job_init(&(*job)->base, entity, 1, owner);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   int amdgpu_job_alloc_with_ib(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_submit.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_submit.c
>>> index 45403ea38906..74a446711207 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_submit.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_submit.c
>>> @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ int etnaviv_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, 
>>> void *data,
>>>   
>>>     ret = drm_sched_job_init(&submit->sched_job,
>>>                              &ctx->sched_entity[args->pipe],
>>> -                            submit->ctx);
>>> +                            1, submit->ctx);
>>>     if (ret)
>>>             goto err_submit_put;
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>> index 50c2075228aa..5dc6678e1eb9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_sched.c
>>> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ int lima_sched_task_init(struct lima_sched_task *task,
>>>     for (i = 0; i < num_bos; i++)
>>>             drm_gem_object_get(&bos[i]->base.base);
>>>   
>>> -   err = drm_sched_job_init(&task->base, &context->base, vm);
>>> +   err = drm_sched_job_init(&task->base, &context->base, 1, vm);
>>>     if (err) {
>>>             kfree(task->bos);
>>>             return err;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
>>> index 3f1aa4de3b87..6d230c38e4f5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static struct msm_gem_submit *submit_create(struct 
>>> drm_device *dev,
>>>             return ERR_PTR(ret);
>>>     }
>>>   
>>> -   ret = drm_sched_job_init(&submit->base, queue->entity, queue);
>>> +   ret = drm_sched_job_init(&submit->base, queue->entity, 1, queue);
>>>     if (ret) {
>>>             kfree(submit->hw_fence);
>>>             kfree(submit);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
>>> index f26a814a9920..e991426d86e4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
>>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ nouveau_job_init(struct nouveau_job *job,
>>>   
>>>     }
>>>   
>>> -   ret = drm_sched_job_init(&job->base, &entity->base, NULL);
>>> +   ret = drm_sched_job_init(&job->base, &entity->base, 1, NULL);
>>>     if (ret)
>>>             goto err_free_chains;
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>>> index b834777b409b..54d1c19bea84 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
>>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static int panfrost_ioctl_submit(struct drm_device 
>>> *dev, void *data,
>>>   
>>>     ret = drm_sched_job_init(&job->base,
>>>                              &file_priv->sched_entity[slot],
>>> -                            NULL);
>>> +                            1, NULL);
>>>     if (ret)
>>>             goto out_put_job;
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>>> index 3143ecaaff86..2e4ffdecc5dc 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
>>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(drm_sched_job,
>>>                        __assign_str(name, sched_job->sched->name);
>>>                        __entry->job_count = 
>>> spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue);
>>>                        __entry->hw_job_count = atomic_read(
>>> -                              &sched_job->sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> +                              &sched_job->sched->submission_count);
>>>                        ),
>>>         TP_printk("entity=%p, id=%llu, fence=%p, ring=%s, job count:%u, hw 
>>> job count:%d",
>>>                   __entry->entity, __entry->id,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> index 437c50867c99..6395090d5784 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
>>> @@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ static void drm_sched_entity_wakeup(struct dma_fence *f,
>>>             container_of(cb, struct drm_sched_entity, cb);
>>>   
>>>     drm_sched_entity_clear_dep(f, cb);
>>> -   drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(drm_sched_entity_to_scheduler(entity));
>>> +   drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(drm_sched_entity_to_scheduler(entity),
>>> +                                 entity);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   /**
>>> @@ -645,7 +646,7 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job 
>>> *sched_job)
>>>             if (fifo)
>>>                     drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, submit_ts);
>>>   
>>> -           drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(sched);
>>> +           drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(sched, entity);
>>>     }
>>>   }
>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_entity_push_job);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> index 88ef8be2d3c7..da86dd0782d6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
>>> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ int drm_sched_policy_default = DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO;
>>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(sched_policy, "Specify the scheduling policy for 
>>> entities on a run-queue, " __stringify(DRM_SCHED_POLICY_RR) " = Round 
>>> Robin, " __stringify(DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO) " = FIFO (default).");
>>>   module_param_named(sched_policy, drm_sched_policy_default, int, 0444);
>>>   
>>> +static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                           struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>> +
>>>   static __always_inline bool drm_sched_entity_compare_before(struct 
>>> rb_node *a,
>>>                                                         const struct 
>>> rb_node *b)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -212,13 +215,15 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq 
>>> *rq,
>>>   /**
>>>    * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr - Select an entity which could provide a 
>>> job to run
>>>    *
>>> + * @sched: the gpu scheduler
>>>    * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>>    * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
>>>    *
>>>    * Try to find a ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>>    */
>>>   static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                         struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>   {
>>>     struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>   
>>> @@ -228,6 +233,12 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, 
>>> bool dequeue)
>>>     if (entity) {
>>>             list_for_each_entry_continue(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>>                     if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> +                           /* If we can't queue yet, preserve the current
>>> +                            * entity in terms of fairness.
>>> +                            */
>>> +                           if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity))
>>> +                                   goto out;
>>> +
>>>                             if (dequeue) {
>>>                                     rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>                                     reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> @@ -239,8 +250,13 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, 
>>> bool dequeue)
>>>     }
>>>   
>>>     list_for_each_entry(entity, &rq->entities, list) {
>>> -
>>>             if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> +                   /* If we can't queue yet, preserve the current entity in
>>> +                    * terms of fairness.
>>> +                    */
>>> +                   if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity))
>>> +                           goto out;
>>> +
>>>                     if (dequeue) {
>>>                             rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>                             reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> @@ -253,21 +269,23 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(struct drm_sched_rq 
>>> *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>                     break;
>>>     }
>>>   
>>> +out:
>>>     spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>> -
>>>     return NULL;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   /**
>>>    * drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo - Select an entity which provides a 
>>> job to run
>>>    *
>>> + * @sched: the gpu scheduler
>>>    * @rq: scheduler run queue to check.
>>>    * @dequeue: dequeue selected entity
>>>    *
>>>    * Find oldest waiting ready entity, returns NULL if none found.
>>>    */
>>>   static struct drm_sched_entity *
>>> -drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>> +drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                           struct drm_sched_rq *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>   {
>>>     struct rb_node *rb;
>>>   
>>> @@ -277,6 +295,15 @@ drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(struct drm_sched_rq 
>>> *rq, bool dequeue)
>>>   
>>>             entity = rb_entry(rb, struct drm_sched_entity, rb_tree_node);
>>>             if (drm_sched_entity_is_ready(entity)) {
>>> +                   /* If we can't queue yet, don't pick another entity
>>> +                    * which's job might fit and wait until we got space for
>>> +                    * this one in terms of fairness.
>>> +                    */
>>> +                   if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity)) {
>>> +                           spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
>>> +                           return NULL;
>>> +                   }
>>> +
>>
>> I wonder if here it would've been cleaner to just do,
>>
>>                      if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity)) {
>>                              rb = NULL;
>>                              break;
>>                      }
>>
>> in order to follow the natural flow of the R-B tree search?
>> In other words, the loop invariant becomes false, we exit the loop,
>> unlock and return NULL.
>>
>> Yeah, let's do that.
>>
>>>                     if (dequeue) {
>>>                             rq->current_entity = entity;
>>>                             reinit_completion(&entity->entity_idle);
>>> @@ -302,13 +329,32 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_queue(struct 
>>> drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>>   /**
>>>    * drm_sched_can_queue -- Can we queue more to the hardware?
>>>    * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + * @entity: the scheduler entity
>>>    *
>>> - * Return true if we can push more jobs to the hw, otherwise false.
>>> + * Return true if we can push at least one more job from @entity, false
>>> + * otherwise.
>>>    */
>>> -static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> +static bool drm_sched_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                           struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>>   {
>>> -   return atomic_read(&sched->hw_rq_count) <
>>> -           sched->hw_submission_limit;
>>> +   struct drm_sched_job *s_job;
>>> +
>>> +   s_job = to_drm_sched_job(spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue));
>>> +   if (!s_job)
>>> +           return false;
>>> +
>>> +   if (sched->ops->update_job_credits) {
>>> +           u32 credits = sched->ops->update_job_credits(s_job);
>>> +
>>> +           if (credits)
>>> +                   s_job->submission_credits = credits;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   WARN_ON(s_job->submission_credits > sched->submission_limit);
>>> +
>>> +   return (sched->submission_limit -
>>> +           atomic_read(&sched->submission_count)) >=
>>> +           s_job->submission_credits;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   /**
>>> @@ -325,12 +371,10 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler 
>>> *sched, bool dequeue)
>>>     struct drm_sched_entity *entity;
>>>     int i;
>>>   
>>> -   if (!drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>> -           return NULL;
>>> -
>>>     if (sched->single_entity) {
>>>             if (!READ_ONCE(sched->single_entity->stopped) &&
>>> -               drm_sched_entity_is_ready(sched->single_entity))
>>> +               drm_sched_entity_is_ready(sched->single_entity) &&
>>> +               drm_sched_can_queue(sched, sched->single_entity))
>>>                     return sched->single_entity;
>>
>> This mixing of the Xe patches and this patch is very, very annoying.
>> Here and in RR picking the entity mix-up with "dequeue" which is
>> now "peek"...
>>
>> I'd like to have applied this patch to drm-misc-next and inspect it further,
>> but cannot chase around which version of the Xe patches this patch applies
>> to, cleanly, so I'd really rather have had this patch on a clean 
>> drm-misc-next
>> tree.
> 
> I pushed you a branch [1], it's based on drm-misc-next plus V4 of the sched 
> changes for XE series.
> 
> I'll reply to the other comments tomorrow.
> 
> - Danilo
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/commits/sched-credits/

This is still based on (an old version of) the Xe patches.

Please rebase your patch on top of a clean drm-misc-next, integrating my 
comments
in this thread 
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/b52c58e4-8ae6-4272-a67e-d811c6359...@amd.com),
and post it for review.

I don't see much point in delaying this patch and it would most likely be okay
if you post it rebased off of a clean drm-misc-next (so I can apply it cleanly),
and you've integrated my comments in this thread.
-- 
Regards,
Luben

>>
>>>   
>>>             return NULL;
>>> @@ -339,9 +383,11 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct drm_gpu_scheduler 
>>> *sched, bool dequeue)
>>>     /* Kernel run queue has higher priority than normal run queue*/
>>>     for (i = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT - 1; i >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN; 
>>> i--) {
>>>             entity = sched->sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO ?
>>> -                   drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>> +                   drm_sched_rq_select_entity_fifo(sched,
>>> +                                                   &sched->sched_rq[i],
>>>                                                     dequeue) :
>>> -                   drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(&sched->sched_rq[i],
>>> +                   drm_sched_rq_select_entity_rr(sched,
>>> +                                                 &sched->sched_rq[i],
>>>                                                   dequeue);
>>>             if (entity)
>>>                     break;
>>> @@ -399,7 +445,7 @@ static void drm_sched_job_done(struct drm_sched_job 
>>> *s_job, int result)
>>>     struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence = s_job->s_fence;
>>>     struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched = s_fence->sched;
>>>   
>>> -   atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> +   atomic_sub(s_job->submission_credits, &sched->submission_count);
>>>     atomic_dec(sched->score);
>>>   
>>>     trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
>>> @@ -622,7 +668,8 @@ void drm_sched_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, 
>>> struct drm_sched_job *bad)
>>>                                           &s_job->cb)) {
>>>                     dma_fence_put(s_job->s_fence->parent);
>>>                     s_job->s_fence->parent = NULL;
>>> -                   atomic_dec(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> +                   atomic_sub(s_job->submission_credits,
>>> +                              &sched->submission_count);
>>>             } else {
>>>                     /*
>>>                      * remove job from pending_list.
>>> @@ -683,7 +730,7 @@ void drm_sched_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, 
>>> bool full_recovery)
>>>     list_for_each_entry_safe(s_job, tmp, &sched->pending_list, list) {
>>>             struct dma_fence *fence = s_job->s_fence->parent;
>>>   
>>> -           atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> +           atomic_add(s_job->submission_credits, &sched->submission_count);
>>>   
>>>             if (!full_recovery)
>>>                     continue;
>>> @@ -764,6 +811,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_resubmit_jobs);
>>>    * drm_sched_job_init - init a scheduler job
>>>    * @job: scheduler job to init
>>>    * @entity: scheduler entity to use
>>> + * @submission_credits: the number of credits this job contributes to the
>>> + * schdulers submission limit
>>
>> Spelling: "schedulers"!
>>
>> Please run your patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict and inspect 
>> what it says.
>>
>>>    * @owner: job owner for debugging
>>>    *
>>>    * Refer to drm_sched_entity_push_job() documentation
>>> @@ -781,6 +830,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_resubmit_jobs);
>>>    */
>>>   int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>                    struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> +                  u32 submission_credits,
>>>                    void *owner)
>>>   {
>>>     if (!entity->rq && !entity->single_sched)
>>> @@ -792,6 +842,7 @@ int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>             return -ENOMEM;
>>>   
>>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&job->list);
>>> +   job->submission_credits = submission_credits ? submission_credits : 1;
>>>   
>>>     xa_init_flags(&job->dependencies, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>>>   
>>> @@ -1004,12 +1055,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_job_cleanup);
>>>   /**
>>>    * drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue - Wake up the scheduler
>>>    * @sched: scheduler instance
>>> + * @entity: the scheduler entity
>>>    *
>>>    * Wake up the scheduler if we can queue jobs.
>>>    */
>>> -void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
>>> +void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                              struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>>>   {
>>> -   if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched))
>>> +   if (drm_sched_can_queue(sched, entity))
>>>             drm_sched_run_job_queue(sched);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> @@ -1147,7 +1200,7 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct 
>>> *w)
>>>   
>>>     s_fence = sched_job->s_fence;
>>>   
>>> -   atomic_inc(&sched->hw_rq_count);
>>> +   atomic_add(sched_job->submission_credits, &sched->submission_count);
>>>     drm_sched_job_begin(sched_job);
>>>   
>>>     trace_drm_run_job(sched_job, entity);
>>> @@ -1183,7 +1236,7 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct 
>>> *w)
>>>    * @ops: backend operations for this scheduler
>>>    * @submit_wq: workqueue to use for submission. If NULL, an ordered wq is
>>>    *               allocated and used
>>> - * @hw_submission: number of hw submissions that can be in flight
>>> + * @max_submission_credits: number of submission credits that can be in 
>>> flight
>>
>> Let's not use "in flight". Perhaps it is better to say,
>>
>>   * @max_submission_credits: number of submission credits this scheduler can 
>> hold
>>   *                          from all jobs,
>>
>>>    * @hang_limit: number of times to allow a job to hang before dropping it
>>>    * @timeout: timeout value in jiffies for the scheduler
>>>    * @timeout_wq: workqueue to use for timeout work. If NULL, the system_wq 
>>> is
>>> @@ -1198,7 +1251,7 @@ static void drm_sched_run_job_work(struct work_struct 
>>> *w)
>>>   int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>                const struct drm_sched_backend_ops *ops,
>>>                struct workqueue_struct *submit_wq,
>>> -              unsigned hw_submission, unsigned hang_limit,
>>> +              unsigned max_submission_credits, unsigned hang_limit,
>>>                long timeout, struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq,
>>>                atomic_t *score, const char *name,
>>>                enum drm_sched_policy sched_policy,
>>> @@ -1211,7 +1264,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>   
>>>     sched->ops = ops;
>>>     sched->single_entity = NULL;
>>> -   sched->hw_submission_limit = hw_submission;
>>> +   sched->submission_limit = max_submission_credits;
>>>     sched->name = name;
>>>     if (!submit_wq) {
>>>             sched->submit_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(name, 0);
>>> @@ -1238,7 +1291,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>     init_waitqueue_head(&sched->job_scheduled);
>>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->pending_list);
>>>     spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list_lock);
>>> -   atomic_set(&sched->hw_rq_count, 0);
>>> +   atomic_set(&sched->submission_count, 0);
>>>     INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sched->work_tdr, drm_sched_job_timedout);
>>>     INIT_WORK(&sched->work_run_job, drm_sched_run_job_work);
>>>     INIT_WORK(&sched->work_free_job, drm_sched_free_job_work);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>> index 2e94ce788c71..8479e5302f7b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_gem.c
>>> @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ v3d_job_init(struct v3d_dev *v3d, struct drm_file 
>>> *file_priv,
>>>     job->free = free;
>>>   
>>>     ret = drm_sched_job_init(&job->base, &v3d_priv->sched_entity[queue],
>>> -                            v3d_priv);
>>> +                            1, v3d_priv);
>>>     if (ret)
>>>             goto fail;
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> index 27f5778bbd6d..c4a53b259585 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
>>> @@ -329,6 +329,8 @@ struct drm_sched_fence *to_drm_sched_fence(struct 
>>> dma_fence *f);
>>>    * @sched: the scheduler instance on which this job is scheduled.
>>>    * @s_fence: contains the fences for the scheduling of job.
>>>    * @finish_cb: the callback for the finished fence.
>>> + * @submission_credits: the number of submission credits this job 
>>> contributes to
>>> + *                      the scheduler
>>>    * @work: Helper to reschdeule job kill to different context.
>>>    * @id: a unique id assigned to each job scheduled on the scheduler.
>>>    * @karma: increment on every hang caused by this job. If this exceeds 
>>> the hang
>>> @@ -348,6 +350,8 @@ struct drm_sched_job {
>>>     struct drm_gpu_scheduler        *sched;
>>>     struct drm_sched_fence          *s_fence;
>>>   
>>> +   u32                             submission_credits;
>>> +
>>>     /*
>>>      * work is used only after finish_cb has been used and will not be
>>>      * accessed anymore.
>>> @@ -471,6 +475,21 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
>>>            * and it's time to clean it up.
>>>      */
>>>     void (*free_job)(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job);
>>> +
>>> +   /**
>>> +    * @update_job_credits: Called once the scheduler is considering this
>>> +    * job for execution.
>>> +    *
>>> +    * Drivers may use this to update the job's submission credits, which is
>>> +    * useful to e.g. deduct the number of native fences which have been
>>> +    * signaled meanwhile.
>>> +    *
>>> +    * The callback must either return the new number of submission credits
>>> +    * for the given job, or zero if no update is required.
>>> +    *
>>> +    * This callback is optional.
>>> +    */
>>> +   u32 (*update_job_credits)(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job);
>>>   };
>>
>> That's good.
>>
>>>   
>>>   /**
>>> @@ -478,14 +497,14 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
>>>    *
>>>    * @ops: backend operations provided by the driver.
>>>    * @single_entity: Single entity for the scheduler
>>> - * @hw_submission_limit: the max size of the hardware queue.
>>> + * @submission_limit: the maximim number of submission credits
>>> + * @submission_count: the number of submission credits in flight
>>
>> Is this clear enough?
>>
>> I mean, what really is a "submission_limit"? What is it limiting really?
>> Number of what? "Submissions"? No. It's credits.
>>
>> ("Submission" seems to have become very popular, see
>>   Message-ID: <a39eb381-4f2b-439b-b223-c5148167b...@amd.com>, maybe through 
>> Lore.)
>>
>> So if "submission_credit_limit" and "submission_credit_count"
>> seem too wordy, (and they kind of are), then perhaps use,
>>
>>      @credit_limit: the credit limit of this scheduler
>>      @credit_count: the current credit count of this scheduler
>>
>> Also note the slight comment update for those two quantities.
>>
>>>    * @timeout: the time after which a job is removed from the scheduler.
>>>    * @name: name of the ring for which this scheduler is being used.
>>>    * @sched_rq: priority wise array of run queues.
>>>    * @job_scheduled: once @drm_sched_entity_do_release is called the 
>>> scheduler
>>>    *                 waits on this wait queue until all the scheduled jobs 
>>> are
>>>    *                 finished.
>>> - * @hw_rq_count: the number of jobs currently in the hardware queue.
>>>    * @job_id_count: used to assign unique id to the each job.
>>>    * @submit_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_run_job and @work_free_job
>>>    * @timeout_wq: workqueue used to queue @work_tdr
>>> @@ -511,12 +530,12 @@ struct drm_sched_backend_ops {
>>>   struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
>>>     const struct drm_sched_backend_ops      *ops;
>>>     struct drm_sched_entity         *single_entity;
>>> -   uint32_t                        hw_submission_limit;
>>> +   u32                             submission_limit;
>>> +   atomic_t                        submission_count;
>>
>> See above. Perhaps "credit_limit" and "credit_count".
>>
>>>     long                            timeout;
>>>     const char                      *name;
>>>     struct drm_sched_rq             sched_rq[DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_COUNT];
>>>     wait_queue_head_t               job_scheduled;
>>> -   atomic_t                        hw_rq_count;
>>>     atomic64_t                      job_id_count;
>>>     struct workqueue_struct         *submit_wq;
>>>     struct workqueue_struct         *timeout_wq;
>>> @@ -539,7 +558,7 @@ struct drm_gpu_scheduler {
>>>   int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>                const struct drm_sched_backend_ops *ops,
>>>                struct workqueue_struct *submit_wq,
>>> -              uint32_t hw_submission, unsigned hang_limit,
>>> +              uint32_t max_submission_credits, unsigned hang_limit,
>>>                long timeout, struct workqueue_struct *timeout_wq,
>>>                atomic_t *score, const char *name,
>>>                enum drm_sched_policy sched_policy,
>>> @@ -548,6 +567,7 @@ int drm_sched_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>>   void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>>   int drm_sched_job_init(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>>                    struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>> +                  u32 submission_credits,
>>>                    void *owner);
>>>   void drm_sched_job_arm(struct drm_sched_job *job);
>>>   int drm_sched_job_add_dependency(struct drm_sched_job *job,
>>> @@ -570,7 +590,8 @@ void drm_sched_entity_modify_sched(struct 
>>> drm_sched_entity *entity,
>>>   
>>>   void drm_sched_tdr_queue_imm(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>>   void drm_sched_job_cleanup(struct drm_sched_job *job);
>>> -void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>> +void drm_sched_wakeup_if_can_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
>>> +                              struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>>>   bool drm_sched_submit_ready(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>>   void drm_sched_submit_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>>   void drm_sched_submit_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched);
>>
> 


Reply via email to