Hi Konrad,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 2b3d5988ae2cb5cd945ddbc653f0a71706231fdd]

url:    
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Konrad-Dybcio/soc-qcom-Move-some-socinfo-defines-to-the-header-expand-them/20240405-164231
base:   2b3d5988ae2cb5cd945ddbc653f0a71706231fdd
patch link:    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405-topic-smem_speedbin-v1-2-ce2b864251b1%40linaro.org
patch subject: [PATCH 2/6] soc: qcom: smem: Add pcode/fcode getters
config: arm-defconfig 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240406/202404060648.dojoyusf-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 
f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): 
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240406/202404060648.dojoyusf-...@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
| Closes: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404060648.dojoyusf-...@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c:807: warning: Function parameter or struct member 
>> 'code' not described in 'qcom_smem_get_feature_code'
>> drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c:807: warning: Excess function parameter 'id' 
>> description in 'qcom_smem_get_feature_code'
>> drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c:840: warning: Function parameter or struct member 
>> 'code' not described in 'qcom_smem_get_product_code'
>> drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c:840: warning: Excess function parameter 'id' 
>> description in 'qcom_smem_get_product_code'


vim +807 drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c

   797  
   798  /**
   799   * qcom_smem_get_feature_code() - return the feature code
   800   * @id: On success, we return the feature code here.
   801   *
   802   * Look up the feature code identifier from SMEM and return it.
   803   *
   804   * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
   805   */
   806  int qcom_smem_get_feature_code(u32 *code)
 > 807  {
   808          struct socinfo *info;
   809          u32 raw_code;
   810  
   811          info = qcom_smem_get(QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY, SMEM_HW_SW_BUILD_ID, 
NULL);
   812          if (IS_ERR(info))
   813                  return PTR_ERR(info);
   814  
   815          /* This only makes sense for socinfo >= 16 */
   816          if (__le32_to_cpu(info->fmt) < SOCINFO_VERSION(0, 16))
   817                  return -EINVAL;
   818  
   819          raw_code = __le32_to_cpu(info->feature_code);
   820  
   821          /* Ensure the value makes sense */
   822          if (raw_code >= SOCINFO_FC_INT_RESERVE)
   823                  raw_code = SOCINFO_FC_UNKNOWN;
   824  
   825          *code = raw_code;
   826  
   827          return 0;
   828  }
   829  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_smem_get_feature_code);
   830  
   831  /**
   832   * qcom_smem_get_product_code() - return the product code
   833   * @id: On success, we return the product code here.
   834   *
   835   * Look up feature code identifier from SMEM and return it.
   836   *
   837   * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on failure.
   838   */
   839  int qcom_smem_get_product_code(u32 *code)
 > 840  {
   841          struct socinfo *info;
   842          u32 raw_code;
   843  
   844          info = qcom_smem_get(QCOM_SMEM_HOST_ANY, SMEM_HW_SW_BUILD_ID, 
NULL);
   845          if (IS_ERR(info))
   846                  return PTR_ERR(info);
   847  
   848          /* This only makes sense for socinfo >= 16 */
   849          if (__le32_to_cpu(info->fmt) < SOCINFO_VERSION(0, 16))
   850                  return -EINVAL;
   851  
   852          raw_code = __le32_to_cpu(info->pcode);
   853  
   854          /* Ensure the value makes sense */
   855          if (raw_code >= SOCINFO_FC_INT_RESERVE)
   856                  raw_code = SOCINFO_FC_UNKNOWN;
   857  
   858          *code = raw_code;
   859  
   860          return 0;
   861  }
   862  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_smem_get_product_code);
   863  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Reply via email to