On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100 Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200 > > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [snip] > >>Is r100/r200 a completely different thing? > >>If not why not a patch against both? > >>Then the testing audience should be much "wider". > >> > > > > Sure. As far as I could see the code is very similar. However, this: > > rmesa->do_irqs = (0 && > > rmesa->dri.drmMinor >= 6 && > > !getenv("R200_NO_IRQS") && > > rmesa->r200Screen->irq); > > looks like IRQs are turned off by default on R200. So my code wouldn't > > be used. Is the reason for IRQs being disabled that the frame throttling > > is not implemented properly or are there lower level problems with IRQs? > > No, this is a hangover from the bugs last week. It can be removed now. Ok, I just saw your commit. I'm working on it now. It will take a while, though. The code is ready but I want to compile it at least and I havn't enabled compiling the r200 driver. Is there a faster way than doing a make world after changing config.cf? > > Keith > Felix __\|/__ ___ ___ ___ __Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___ _____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/ at the same time! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel