Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 23:48 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100
>
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Felix Kühling wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> > > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >>Is r100/r200 a completely different thing?
> > >>If not why not a patch against both?
> > >>Then the testing audience should be much "wider".
> > >
> > > Sure. As far as I could see the code is very similar. However, this:
> > > rmesa->do_irqs = (0 &&
> > > rmesa->dri.drmMinor >= 6 &&
> > > !getenv("R200_NO_IRQS") &&
> > > rmesa->r200Screen->irq);
> > > looks like IRQs are turned off by default on R200. So my code wouldn't
> > > be used. Is the reason for IRQs being disabled that the frame
> > > throttling is not implemented properly or are there lower level
> > > problems with IRQs?
> >
> > No, this is a hangover from the bugs last week. It can be removed now.
>
> Ok, I just saw your commit. I'm working on it now. It will take a while,
> though. The code is ready but I want to compile it at least and I havn't
> enabled compiling the r200 driver. Is there a faster way than doing a
> make world after changing config.cf?
Is "make Everything" enough?
But on my dual Athlon MP 1900+ a whole DRI CVS compilation takes ~9 min;-)
xc/xc> time nice +19 make -j3 World >& world.log
484.570u 64.300s 9:09.37 99.9% 0+0k 0+0io 6244578pf+0w
That's why I'm offering my CPU time... Not every DRI developer has a SMP
system as I remember and so I think testing on SMP is needed.
Cheers,
Dieter
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
