On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > >On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > > >>Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> > >>>These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the > >>>attached patch? > >>> > >>Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. > >>We're not working on them. > >> > > > >In that case I'd vote again for removing unused drivers etc. as well. > > I'm ok with that too, as long as it simplifies rather than complicates the > lives of people who are doing XFree merges.
I wouldn't like to remove the drivers. They don't cause any import conflicts and they're useful to those who want to start a DRI driver for another chipset. But GLU is a pain in the neck. It has alsorts of $Id, $Revision and $Date cvs tags that get updated during commits. This causes import conflicts and the work involved to resolve them. I doubt we'll ever work on GLU or GLw. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
