On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:11:10PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: > > That definately sounds like the Right Thing To Do. > > Easier said than done. > > I'm willing to bet that there's around 100 header files in the XFree86 > tree that get pulled into the compilation of the various DRI-related > source files.
well, you could always revert to the utah-glx method, of duplicating an include tree with *just* the X11 header files. > Then, there's the Imakefile system. For every directory with DRI- > related files you'd have to keep all Imakefiles in all parent > directories. Or... stop using Imake, and switch to autoconf. > I'm not sure that the effort involved in setting that up would be > worth it. Obviously, it is a very considerable amount of effort. But the results would be much cleaner, and hopefully lead to more abstraction away from the xfree code, and into a code tree structure that is more tightly coherent in and of itself ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
