Philip Brown wrote:
Easier said than done.On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:46:35PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:... If the goal is to make the DRI CVS as small as possible, why not go all the way and turn it into an environment for building only the DRI-related modules? That would change the nature of XFree86 merges quite a bit, but that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing.That definately sounds like the Right Thing To Do.
I'm willing to bet that there's around 100 header files in the XFree86
tree that get pulled into the compilation of the various DRI-related
source files.
Determining what to keep and what to discard would be a long process.
Then, there's the Imakefile system. For every directory with DRI-
related files you'd have to keep all Imakefiles in all parent
directories.
Eventually you'd wind up with a skeleton of the XFree86 tree with
key files scattered throughout.
I'm not sure that the effort involved in setting that up would be
worth it.
-Brian
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Battle your brains against the best in the Thawte Crypto Challenge. Be the first to crack the code - register now: http://www.gothawte.com/rd521.html
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
