On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote: >> Right now for 2.4 I'm juggling too many conflicting balls, if its all in >> the DRM CVS then merging stuff added to DRM cvs is a real nobrainer, and >> since I can do it item by item as it changes its also easy to know when >> something bad happens. > >I've been looking at what's in 2.4 and it's quite divergent from what we've >got on the trunk. It is pretty closely related to the xfree 4.2 code, though, >and most of the changes seem to be in the 2.4 code. > >Are you proposing pulling the dri trunk code into 2.4?
Is the DRI trunk compatible with XFree86 4.1.0, 4.2.0, 4.2.1, and current CVS XFree86? If so, and it is considered stable, which is what I presume by it being considered for 2.4.x integration, then it makes sense to me to do so. Backward compatibility with releases back at least as far as 4.1.0 is critically important though. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
