On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote: > > Does DRI have a future with neither NVIDIA nor ATI participating? > > Are people actually talking to them about why they don't use it and > > what has to be done to remedy this fact? Shouldn't this be a top priority? > > To clarify: I meant what has to be done to make DRI (direct rendering > *infrastructure*) attractive for IHVs. I didn't mean to imply what has to be > done to get NVIDIA or ATI to release open source drivers and whatnot. > > The open source/ closed source discussion has been beaten to death and is > irrelevant to this thread. > > My point was/is that without NVIDIA or ATI using the DRI infrastructure it > is doomed to fail.
Uhmmm... ATI *does* use the DRI infrastructure for their drivers. Adam ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
