On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Daniel Vogel wrote: >> Does DRI have a future with neither NVIDIA nor ATI participating? >> Are people actually talking to them about why they don't use it and >> what has to be done to remedy this fact? Shouldn't this be a top priority? > >To clarify: I meant what has to be done to make DRI (direct >rendering *infrastructure*) attractive for IHVs. I didn't mean >to imply what has to be done to get NVIDIA or ATI to release >open source drivers and whatnot. > >The open source/ closed source discussion has been beaten to >death and is irrelevant to this thread. > >My point was/is that without NVIDIA or ATI using the DRI >infrastructure it is doomed to fail.
Well... for starters.... ATI *is* using the DRI infrastructure. Does that mean that you think DRI is doomed to success now? -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
