On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 06:08:00PM -0300, Maximo wrote:
> At 08:56 PM 13/6/2003, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> >The DDX driver (the XFree86 2D driver) talks directly with the hardware,
> >but for the 2D operations. Whenever 3D is going on the DDX does nothing
> >except to wait for the 3D to finish.
> 
> Where exactly savage driver stopped? on DDX driver? What does it still need 
> coding?

No. The work in the DDX driver is mostly finished. The DDX was already
there (on the XFree86 driver) and it was only necessary to make DRI
aware, i.e., to behave nicely with DRI and initialize the other drivers.

The DRM is barely finished. It exists but it doesn't talk with the card
at all yet.

> I was able to build the savage driver from CVS and I would like to know how 
> can i debug and test it? How do i know what is working?

At this point by looking at the logs. The /var/log/XFree86.0.log and the
/var/log/messages to be more precise.

At this point there isn't much to test. It's necessary to make the DRM
talk with the card (i.e., send command buffers and wait for idle), and
then write a small test program to draw a few triangles to check it
works, as Andreas mentioned.

> Where do i find any documentation about predefined functions that i will 
> need? Is there any faq or doc about that?

I don't quite understand what you mean here for predefined functions...
>
> Witch driver do you think it's similar to savage?

I think that r128 would be a good bet. It's roughly from the same
generation as the savage, and the driver is in good state. The radeon
driver is the most advanced but it's excessivly complicated for the
savage capabilities.

José Fonseca


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to