On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:52, Ian Romanick wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 00:54, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>We also need a way to specify that interrupts are not available. In > >>this case, we don't want to export any of the vsync related GLX extensions. > > > > The only way to find out is to try the ioctl, so maybe try it in > > CreateContext() and set VBLANK_FLAG_NO_IRQ if it fails? > > > > My point is that rmesa->do_irqs has nothing to do with this. > > Why not? do_irqs gets set in three cases: > > 1. The kernel version was too low to query for an IRQ number. > 2. The kernel version was high enough to query for an IRQ number, but > none was reported. > 3. The user specifically asks that interrupts not be used, for whatever > reason.
These are all about SW interrupts, they don't say anything about vblank. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
