On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: > It sounds like it should be sophisticated enough to allow a transition where > sourceforge cvs continues to work and be updated, and accept updates of its > own. That is it *sounds* like we could have some developers using cvs, some > bitkeeper but have changes to some notional "trunk" propogate to and be > visible in both systems - if done rapidly enough there should be few conflicts > requiring manual resolution.
Given the reliability of sourceforge, do we (well, the dri developers) want to keep two varied copies of the code that may take days (or weeks) to come-in-line? Adam ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
