On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 17:11, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:59:43PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:57, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > -- Michel Dnzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have been using both for a year and BK is simply much better than CVS. > > > > I know bk is the best version control system in the universe > > feature-wise, no need to say it again. And again. And again. (And again) > > I still don't want to use it. > > I'm not sure that anyone is asking you to use it. What's wrong with the > people who want to use BK use BK and the people who want to use CVS use CVS?
Nothing whatsoever. But IMHO there's something wrong with people who keep trying to shove non-free tools down everyone else's throats. Contrary to earlier statements, you don't seem to have had enough of this on lkml yet... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
