On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> > A proposal for this has been developed in > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314 (first idea in comment #20, > refinement inspired by > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11659.html in comment #27) Very interesting, I certainly would be delighted if this was implemented. All GATOS drivers need is that framebuffer was moved outside of system RAM. Nothing more. As Keith rightly points out, when one uses ioctl it would be hard to make 3d driver to understand that the aperture moved. I would suggest adding more ioctls: 1. Lock the drm driver against future connections from 3d driver(s). 2. Return the number of current connections. 3. Move the aperture - should only succeed when nothing else is connected. Also, when aperture is moved DRM driver can simply refuse connection to older 3d drivers. best Vladimir Dergachev > > I'd appreciate feedback on this from the GATOS developers, in particular > whether it would be enough to remove the incompatibility of Radeon DRI > components between our projects, or what other issues there are to > consider. > > > PS: I'm not subscribed to the gatos-devel list. > > -- > Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer > Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
