On Sad, 2004-04-17 at 19:40, Ryan Underwood wrote: > Of course, if the legal advice you refer to was specifically aimed at > the firmware scenario, where you have a blob of who-knows-what that does > not execute on the host embedded into a driver binary, then I'm not one > to argue with that.
It was specifically in response to the question about firmware, and whether it would be better if firmware was seperated. I don't know of any direct case law on embedding firmware and at what point it isn't "mere aggregation" ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
