> What is exactly your question concerning licenses? > > > Another topic that I missed was, why did kgi fail and what can we do to avoid > > repeating the same path this time around. > > KGI failed to be accepted by linus/linux. You surely don't want repeating > this ;) Otherwise, its design is still valid, I believe.
My only complaint about KGI was the driver api was way to complex. I believe that one of the BSD use it. I forgot which one. The idea of only universal library never happened. Never will. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
