On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 21:08 -0700, Mike Mestnik wrote: > The second half of the first paragraph controdics with the first. There > are patches and the like avalible. > > The second sentance is refering to the hotplug code, only needed for multi > cards(currently not suported)? Or did you mean something else.
I certainly didn't talk about hotplug, and I must admit I don't understand what you mean in the above paragraphs. Please elaborate, if it's important. (Maybe it helps if you write directly under what you refer to) > Your right about adding interfaces into the kernel, but what's > proposed(the non hotplug stuff) is small and relitively uninteresting > since it's not used by X. There are no currently pkged programs that > would use these extentions so there is nothing stoping a rewrite b4 the > user part is released. So you propose to add an immature interface to the mainline DRM/kernel and cross fingers that it won't turn into a maintenance and/or security nightmare before it gets rewritten? Sounds a little backwards to me. -- Earthling Michel DÃnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
