On 6/21/05, Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/21/05, Thomas Hellström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While this will probably work today it will leave little room for future > > applications of DRI. > > Can XvMC needs be handled via the V4L interface? I would expect an > some point relevant V4L drivers will also get integrated into the > DRM/fbdev composite driver.
the problem is v4l is linux specific while XvMC is X specific and hence multi-platform, plus it has ties to Xv, which would need to be handled as well. > > Is 8K of memory not enough for VIA? Or is the problem that there are > three structures being placed in sarea: DRM, via DRM, via XvMC. With > three structures you can't tell the offset to load the third one at. > Could the three structures problem be fixed by just combining the > structure defs for via DRM and via XvMC? > > Another solution is to create another shared memory type. > > -- > Jon Smirl > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
