We could change it to force a table name to be specified, then load that table info into the cache. How useful is it for someone to want to see the status of ALL of their tables at once?
-Dave On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Andrew Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have been looking into the following bug report: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/622472 > > Basically SHOW TABLE STATUS ignores tables that are not already in the table > cache. I can't really see a solution to this unless we fill the table cache > with what could be useless entries. > > Anyone have an idea for a solution for this? Or should it be documented > that way. > > Kind Regards > -- > Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/ > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
