+1 (although not sure how to express this in data_dictionary)
On 06/09/10 21:20, David Shrewsbury wrote:
We could change it to force a table name to be specified, then load that
table info into the cache. How useful is it for someone to want to see the
status of ALL of their tables at once?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Andrew Hutchings<and...@linuxjedi.co.uk> wrote:
I have been looking into the following bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/622472
Basically SHOW TABLE STATUS ignores tables that are not already in the table
cache. I can't really see a solution to this unless we fill the table cache
with what could be useless entries.
Anyone have an idea for a solution for this? Or should it be documented
that way.
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
