On 6 Sep 2010, at 21:20, David Shrewsbury wrote:
We could change it to force a table name to be specified, then load that
table info into the cache. How useful is it for someone to want to see
the
status of ALL of their tables at once?
On 07/09/10 08:49, Mark Leith wrote:
> Depends if you want to monitor your database or not eh...? ;)
Sure, but in that case the monitoring software could easily do the
equivalent of show tables (which doesn't need the table cache) and then
cycle through the results.
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
